%0 Journal Article
%T 性侵害未成年人犯罪案件的证明路径探析<br>The Analysis of the Proof Method of the Sexual Abuse Crimes of Minors
%A 孙思熠
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 2874-2879
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ojls.2024.125409
%X 性侵害未成年人犯罪案件在司法实践中客观上存在证据形式单一、直接证据较少的特点，因此对此类案件的证明不能机械地理解适用印证证明，过度依赖直接证据作为定案依据。对应地应当采用“以被害人陈述为核心”的证据审查方法，通过对被害人陈述与被告人供述进行合理印证审查，再判断能否排除诬告陷害的可能，通过证据推理与经验推理的结合形成自由心证，综合全案认定是否能够达到事实清楚、证据确实充分的定案标准。<br />
In judicial practice, the crime of sexual abuse against minors has the characteristics of limited form of evidence and limited direct evidence. Therefore, the proof of such cases cannot be mechanically understood by applying confirmation evidence and excessively relying on direct evidence as the basis for determining the case. Correspondingly, an evidence review method should be employed with the “victim’s statement as the core,” by conducting a reasonable confirmation review of the victim’s statement and the defendant’s confession, then assessing whether the possibility of false accusations and framing can be ruled out. Through the combination of evidence reasoning and empirical reasoning to form a free mind, the case should be comprehensively determined to comply with the standard of clear facts and sufficient evidence.
%K 性侵害，未成年人，印证证明，自由心证<br>The Crime of Sexual Abuse
%K Minors
%K Mutual Corroboration
%K Free Proof with Intimate Conviction
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=86613