%0 Journal Article
%T 我国民事诉讼举证责任辨析<br>Analysis of the Burden of Proof in Civil Litigation in China
%A 何一冉
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 2719-2724
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ojls.2024.125385
%X 举证责任是民事诉讼证据理论的一个重要课题，在民事诉讼中发挥着至关重要的作用。近年来，随着我国民事诉讼制度改革的不断推进，其核心的证据制度的探究进程也在不断深入，举证责任制度的强化和落实从一开始就成为了证据制度改革的一条主线。加快完善我国民事诉讼举证责任制度，有利于法官准确判断案件，更好地保护当事人的合法权益。在一定程度上也能弥补司法实践中的漏洞，为进一步完善立法奠定坚实的基础。然而，在具体民事司法案件的举证责任分配方面，我国制度依然存在一些缺陷问题，原本“谁主张，谁举证”的原则已经不再适用于一些复杂疑难案件，需要对民事诉讼举证责任分配做进一步完善，从而有效提升我国民事诉讼判决的公平公正性。因此，文章主要从举证责任的概念、举证责任分配的原则及其例外规定以及我国民事诉讼举证责任制度在实际审判中存在的问题等多个方面进行思考，深入发掘举证责任制度在我国实际审判案件中的应用情况，探讨出当前存在的不足及经验总结，丰富我国举证责任制度的论文研究。<br />
The burden of proof is an important topic in the theory of evidence in civil litigation, playing a crucial role in civil litigation. In recent years, with the continuous advancement of China’s civil litigation system reform, the exploration process of its core evidence system has also been deepening. The strengthening and implementation of the burden of proof system has become a main line of evidence system reform from the beginning. Accelerating the improvement of China’s civil litigation burden of proof system is beneficial for judges to accurately judge cases and better protect the legitimate rights and interests of parties involved. To a certain extent, it can also fill the loopholes in judicial practice and lay a solid foundation for further improving legislation. However, in terms of the allocation of burden of proof in specific civil judicial cases, there are still some deficiencies in China’s system. The principle of “whoever claims, who provides evidence” is no longer applicable to some complex and difficult cases. It is necessary to further improve the allocation of burden of proof in civil litigation, so as to effectively enhance the fairness and impartiality of civil litigation judgments in China. Therefore, the article mainly considers the concept of the burden of proof, the principles and exception provisions of the allocation of the burden of proof, and the problems existing in the actual trial of China’s civil litigation burden of proof system. It deeply explores the application of the burden of proof system in China’s actual trial cases, explores the current shortcomings and experience summary, and enriches the research on China’s burden of proof system.
%K 举证责任制度，举证责任分配，举证责任倒置<br>Burden of Proof System
%K Allocation of Burden of Proof
%K Inverted Burden of Proof
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=86267