%0 Journal Article
%T 下水管道堵塞导致财产损害类案研究<br>A Study on Cases of Property Damage Resulting from Blocked Drainage Pipes
%A 田斌
%J Dispute Settlement
%P 310-317
%@ 2379-3104
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ds.2024.104233
%X “异物”致下水管道堵塞可能的损害后果仅是对共用同一下水管道的个别业主或者与之相邻的业主造成财产上损害，仅涉及私人财产利益的损害问题而不涉及对公共利益的保护。现行法上对该类案型如何解决无明文规定，故实务中法院对此的处理方法并不统一，具体包括类推适用高空抛物相关规则、适用共同危险行为理论与适用公平原则等。以上方法在法教义学层面上都存在着与案型事实相矛盾之处，不应作为法院处理该类案型的理论依据。该类案型应在被法院忽略的过错责任路径上通过对“加害行为”与“过错”的解释寻求解决之道。<br />
The potential damages caused by foreign objects blocking drainage pipes may solely result in property damage to individual owners or those adjacent who share the same drainage system, implicating only private property interests without involving the protection of public interests. Chinese civil law does not explicitly prescribe solutions for such cases now, leading to inconsistent judicial practices, including the analogical application of rules related to objects thrown from height, the theory of joint dangerous actions, and the principle of fairness. These approaches, however, contradict the factual circumstances of such cases at the doctrinal level and should not serve as theoretical bases for courts in handling these types of cases. A resolution should be sought through the overlooked pathway of fault liability, by interpreting the “act of harm” and “fault” in such scenarios.
%K 下水管道，过错责任，公平原则<br>Drainage Pipes
%K Fault Liability
%K Equity Principle
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=85638