%0 Journal Article
%T 人工智能法律客体承担侵权责任划分及赔偿问题研究<br>Study on the Division and Compensation of Artificial Intelligence Legal Objects Assuming Tort Liability
%A 吕子彬
%J Advances in Social Sciences
%P 549-555
%@ 2169-2564
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ass.2024.134334
%X 人工智能在公众场合广为人知，尤其在安全话题方面。自动驾驶、人工智能机器人、人工智能自动人脸识别等技术带来便捷，同时也引发关注。近年来，随着新能源汽车的普及，自动驾驶事故频发，引发了公众对人工智能安全问题的关注。在这些事故发生后，受害者往往难以获得合理解决方案。企业常推卸责任，声称人工智能做出了最佳环境判断，产品设计与损害无关，从而侵害消费者权益。于是，一个关键问题是：事故发生时，人工智能究竟是主体还是客体？解答这个问题需关注人工智能技术本质。作为一种模拟人类智能的技术，人工智能具有自主性、灵活性和复杂性特点。在特定场景下，它可能成为事故发生的主体。<br />
Artificial intelligence is widely known in the public arena, especially when it comes to safety topics. Technologies such as autonomous driving, AI robots, and AI automatic face recognition bring convenience and also raise concerns. In recent years, with the popularity of new energy vehicles, autonomous driving accidents have occurred frequently, raising public concern about AI safety. After these accidents, it is often difficult for victims to obtain reasonable solutions. Companies often shirk their responsibilities, claiming that the AI made the best environmental judgment and that the product design had nothing to do with the damage, thus infringing on consumer rights. Thus, a key question is: was the AI the subject or the object at the time of the accident? Answering this question requires focusing on the nature of AI technology. As a technology that simulates human intelligence, AI is characterised by autonomy, flexibility and complexity. In specific scenarios, it may become the subject of an accident.
%K 人工智能，法律客体，侵权责任<br>Artificial Intelligence
%K Objects of Law
%K Tort Liability
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=85681