%0 Journal Article
%T Petrophysical Evaluation of Cape Three Points Reservoirs
%A Striggner Bedu-Addo
%A Sylvester Kojo Danuor
%A Larry Pax Chegbeleh
%J International Journal of Geosciences
%P 162-179
%@ 2156-8367
%D 2024
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ijg.2024.152011
%X The
findings of a study to ascertain and assess the petrophysical characteristics
of</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> Cape Three Points reservoirs in the
Western basin with a view to describe the reservoir quantitatively using </span></span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">W</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">ell </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Logs</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">, Petrel and </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Techlog</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">. The investigated characteristics, which were all deduced from
geophysical wire-lin</span><span style=\"font-family:&quot;\"><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">e logs, in</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">clude
lithology, porosity, permeability, fluid saturation, and net t</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">o gross
thickness. To characterise the reservoir on the field, a suite of wire-line
logs including gamma ray, resistivity, spontaneous potential, and density logs
for three wells (WELL_1X, WELL_2X, and WELL_3X) from the Tano Cape Three Point
basin were studied. The analyses that were done included lithology delineation,
reservoir identification, and petrophysical parameter determination for the
identified reservoirs. The tops and bases of the three wells </span></span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">analysed</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> were marked at a depth of
1203.06 </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">-</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> 2015.64</span><span style=\"font-family:&quot;\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">m, 3863.03 </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">-</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> 4253.85</span><span style=\"font-family:&quot;\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">m and 2497.38 </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">-</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> 2560.32</span><span style=\"font-family:&quot;\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">m respectively</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">. T</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">here were no hydrocarbons in the reservoirs</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> from the studies</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">. </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">The petrophysical</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> parameters computed </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">for each </span><span style=\"font-family:&quot;\"><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">reservoir provided porosities of 13%, 3% and
%K Petrophysical
%K Cape Three Points
%K Reservoirs
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=131592