%0 Journal Article
%T 举证妨碍制度初探及我国构建<br> A Preliminary Study on the Spoliation of Evidence Production and Its Construction in China
%A 俞逸博
%J Dispute Settlement
%P 727-733
%@ 2379-3104
%D 2024
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/DS.2024.102099
%X 举证妨碍制度最早始于英美法体系之中，是“任何人不因从其过错行为中获利”原则的延申。大陆法系在引进该制度时，主要从证明责任的角度去规制这一行为，并以此为基础来建立惩治体系。我国的“举证妨碍”制度的构建承袭于自大陆法系，本文运用文献研究法及法规研究法探究举证妨碍制度的法律理论基础、构成要件及实施这类行为在不同法系中的法律后果，并对中国现有的举证妨碍制度的法律规范进行研究，通过比较法研究及案例分析的方式发现我国举证妨碍制度的不足，在此基础之上提出我国举证妨碍制度的完善意见。<br />
The Spoliation of evidence production first originated in the common legal system and is an extension of the principle that “no one should benefit from his or her wrongful conduct”. When the civil law system introduced this system, it mainly regulated this behavior from the perspective of burden of proof and established a punishment system based on this. The spoliation of evidence production of our country is inherited from the civil law system. This article uses the literature research method and the legal research method to explore the legal theoretical basis and constituent elements of the spoliation of evidence production and the legal consequences of implementing such behaviors in different legal systems. It also studies the existing legal norms of the obstruction of evidence system in China, and finds the shortcomings of the obstruction of evidence system in China through comparative law research and case analysis. On this basis, it puts forward suggestions for improving the Spoliation of evidence production in China.
%K 举证妨碍，证明责任，民事诉讼<br>The Spoliation of Evidence Production
%K The Burden of Proof
%K Civil Litigation
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=80502