%0 Journal Article
%T 论商标侵权中法定赔偿与惩罚性赔偿的并行适用<br>On the Parallel Application of Statutory Compensation and Punitive Compensation in Trademark Infringement
%A 邱如雪
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 6168-6173
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116884
%X 对于商标侵权中法定赔偿与惩罚性赔偿的适用关系，目前存在单一模式、融合模式和并行模式等三种典型模式。单一模式在适用法定赔偿时考量惩罚性因素，将法定赔偿主要功能和补充功能本末倒置，并有可能架空或削弱惩罚性赔偿条款的适用。融合模式以法定赔偿为基数确定惩罚性赔偿，不仅产生了对侵权人二次惩罚赔偿等负面问题，而且也不符合《商标法》的条文精神。并行模式则在同一案件中根据不同的侵权事实，并列适用惩罚性赔偿与法定赔偿，能够充分发挥惩罚性赔偿条款的作用，扭转司法实践过分依赖法定赔偿条款的局面。<br />
For the applicable relationship between statutory compensation and punitive compensation in trademark infringement, there are three typical models: single model, integration model and parallel model. The single model takes punitive factors into consideration when applying for statutory compensation, puts the main functions and supplementary functions of statutory compensation upside down, and may make the application of punitive compensation clauses irrelevant or weakened. The integration model determines punitive compensation based on statutory compensation, which not only generates negative issues such as secondary punishment and compensation for infringers, but also does not comply with the spirit of the provisions of the Trademark Law. The parallel model applies punitive compensation and statutory compensation in parallel in the same case based on different infringement facts, which can fully play the role of punitive compensation clauses and reverse the situation where judicial practice excessively relies on statutory compensation clauses.
%K 法定赔偿，惩罚性赔偿，单一模式，融合模式，并行适用<br>Statutory Compensation
%K Punitive Compensation
%K Single Model
%K Integration Model
%K Parallel Application
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=75980