%0 Journal Article %T 行政复议权相对集中改革引发发展瓶颈及解决路径
The Relatively Concentrated Reform of Administrative Reconsideration Power Leads to the Development Bottleneck and the Solution Path %A 杨芳 %J Open Journal of Legal Science %P 5950-5955 %@ 2329-7379 %D 2023 %I Hans Publishing %R 10.12677/OJLS.2023.116853 %X 2020年2月,国家实施相对集中行政复议改革,行政复议权相对集中改革是为了提高行政复议效率,促进行政复议公平公正解决争议的关键一环。但是相对集中行政复议权改革之后,行政复议的价值并没有发挥预期的效果。探究行政复议相对集中权改革的背景,分析行政争议特征的变化和社会利益格局的深度调整是其出现的客观条件。相对集中复议权改革在顺应国家复议体制改革的同时也引发了发展瓶颈,比如外部统合内部并未统合导致复议质量不高,形成自我管辖导致公平公正得不到保障,申请人多元选择需求受损、复议权力行使遇到掣肘等。探索实施附院联动、府检联动、府信联动;实施案件简繁分流,复议案件提质增效;复议机关实施三化,提高复议人员法律素养等路径对上述瓶颈进行解决。
In February 2020, the state implemented the reform of relatively centralized administrative reconsideration, and the reform of relatively centralized administrative reconsideration power is a key part of improving the efficiency of administrative reconsideration and promoting fair and just dispute resolution in administrative reconsideration. However, after the relatively centralized administrative reconsideration reform, the value of administrative reconsideration did not play the expected effect. The objective condition of the reform is to explore the background of the reform of the relatively concentrated power of administrative reconsideration, analyze the change of the characteristics of administrative disputes and the deep adjustment of the pattern of social interests. While the reform of the relatively centralized reconsideration right conforms to the reform of the national reconsideration system, it also causes bottlenecks in development, such as the low quality of reconsideration due to the lack of external integration and internal integration, the lack of fairness and justice due to the formation of self-jurisdiction, the impaired demand of applicants for multiple choices, and the obstacles encountered in the exercise of reconsideration power. Explore the implementation of affiliated hospital linkage, government inspection linkage, and government credit linkage; implement simple and complicated cases, review cases to improve quality and efficiency; to solve the above bottleneck, the reconsideration organs implement the three ways to improve the legal literacy of the reconsideration personnel. %K 行政复议权相对集中改革,发展瓶颈,解决路径
Administrative Reconsideration Power Relative Concentration Reform %K Development Bottleneck %K Solution Path %U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=75756