%0 Journal Article
%T 反刍思维量表的修订及信效度检验<br>Revision and Reliability and Validity Test of the Ruminative Responses Scale
%A 王俊尧
%J Advances in Psychology
%P 4186-4193
%@ 2160-7281
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/AP.2023.1310526
%X 目的：修订反刍思维量表，并在大学生群体中进行项目分析和信效度检验。方法：对1150名中国大学生施测，通过项目分析、探索性因素分析以及验证性因素分析等对量表的信效度进行讨论，最终形成了35题的反刍思维量表，共包含四个维度：享受快乐、积极应对、抑制快乐和消极应对，前两个维度属于积极反刍，后两个维度属于消极反刍。结果：经项目分析该问卷具有良好的区分度；信度分析表明，总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.85，探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析显示研究中构建的反刍思维模型拟合较好。结论：修订后的反刍思维量表信效度良好，符合测量学要求，可作为正式测量工具使用。<br />
Objective: To revise the Ruminative Responses Scale and conduct item analysis and test the relia-bility and validity of the scale among college students. Methods: The revised Ruminative Responses Scale was administered to 1150 Chinese college students, and the reliability and validity of the scale was tested through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, resulting in a 35-item Ruminative Responses Scale with four dimensions: enjoyment of pleasure, positive response, inhibition of pleasure, and negative response, with the first two dimensions belonging to positive rumination, and the last two dimensions belonging to negative rumination. Results: Item analysis showed that the scale had good differentiation. Reliability analysis showed that the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of the Ruminative Responses Scale was 0.85. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis showed that the constructed ruminative responses model fitted well. Conclusion: The revised Ruminative Responses Scale has good reliability and validity, meets the requirements of psychometrics, and it can be used as a formal measurement tool.
%K 反刍思维，项目分析，信度，效度<br>Rumination
%K Item Analysis
%K Reliability
%K Validity
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=73456