%0 Journal Article
%T 寻衅滋事罪口袋化的原因及规制路径<br>The Causes and Limiting Paths for Pocketing of the Crime of Picking Quarrels and Provoking Troubles
%A 刘清菁
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 4531-4536
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/OJLS.2023.115644
%X 对于刑法第293条规定的寻衅滋事罪，其法条内容表述概括且抽象，缺乏明确的犯罪类型定义，容易使罪与非罪、不同罪行之间的界限不清，因此，本罪有可能成为某些罪名的兜底性条款。为了使其具有更加明确的界定，需要进一步的探讨和规范。又由于立法用语所涵摄的内容广泛和笼统，构成要件相对模糊导致了司法适用的主观性扩张。为避免寻衅滋事罪的口袋化倾向，需明确本罪的保护法益，通过符合构成要件的各种解释方法来分析法律条文的含义，遵循刑法的谦抑性以及罪刑法定原则，从而实现打击犯罪与保障人权的平衡。<br />
As for the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles stipulated in Article 293 of the Criminal Law, the content of this article is general and abstract, and the lack of a clear definition of the type of crime is easy to make the boundary between crime and non-crime and different crimes blurred. Therefore, this crime may become a transparency provision for some charges. In order to make it more clearly defined, further research and specification will be needed, and because the content of legislative terms are inclusive and ambiguous, the crime components are relatively vague, which leads to the abuse of judicial discretion. To avoid the pocketing tendency of the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles, it is necessary to clarify the legal interest of this crime, analyze the meaning of legal provisions through various interpretation methods that meet the constitutive elements of crime, and follow the principle of modesty and legality of criminal law, so as to achieve the balance between combating crime and protecting human rights.
%K 寻衅滋事罪，口袋化，谦抑性，罪刑法定<br>Crime of Picking Quarrels and Provoking Troubles
%K Pocketing
%K The Principle of Modesty
%K The Principle of Legality
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=72811