%0 Journal Article
%T 浅析刑法中的类推解释和扩张解释<br> Brief Analysis of Analogy Interpretation and Expansion Interpretation in Criminal Law
%A 张琳
%J Dispute Settlement
%P 2353-2357
%@ 2379-3104
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/DS.2023.95319
%X 由于刑法文本存在一定的局限性，因此在司法实践中常常使用各种法律解释方法以正确适用刑法，扩张解释也是其中之一。而扩张解释方法使用不当则容易变成罪刑法定原则所禁止的类推解释，因此要区分类推解释与扩张解释。区分两者比较理想的是双重标准说，以刑法文本范围和国民预测可能性为标准，超出刑法文本范围和国民预测可能性的是类推解释，反之，为扩张解释。<br />
Given the inherent limitations within criminal law texts, a variety of legal interpretive methodologies are frequently employed in judicial practice to ensure the accurate application of criminal law. Extensive interpretation stands as one of these methodologies. However, the improper application of the extensive interpretation approach can easily transform into an analogical interpretation, which is proscribed by the principle of legality in criminal law. Hence, a clear demarcation between analogical and extensive interpretation becomes essential. The dual standard theory provides an optimal means of differentiation, utilizing the scope of criminal law texts and the anticipatory potential of the citizenry as benchmarks. Interpretations that surpass the boundaries set by criminal law texts and citizens’ anticipatory potential are categorized as analogical interpretations, while those that remain within these confines are considered extensive interpretations.
%K 类推解释，扩张解释，刑法文本范围，国民预测可能性<br> Analogical Interpretation
%K Extensive Interpretation
%K Scope of Criminal Law Texts
%K Anticipatory
Potential of Citizens
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=72187