%0 Journal Article
%T 认真对待对灌输式教育的批判<br>Taking Criticism of Indoctrination Education Seriously
%A 邹华莹
%J Advances in Education
%P 5621-5627
%@ 2160-7303
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/AE.2023.138877
%X <span style=\"font-size:14px;\">长期以来，我国学校教育一直被认为是灌输式教学的代名词，通过对灌输、灌输式教学的定义的辨析，得出了我国学校教育并不应该完全等同于灌输式教育，但一直存在着将我国学校教育等同于灌输式教育的倾向，对教师、学生、社会公民等存在着诸多伤害。虽然我国学校教育不等同于灌输式教育但是确实存在着灌输式教育的因素，应采取保罗？弗莱雷提倡的以对话为手段开展的提问式教学方式进行改革，进行改革时应当强调提问式教学法的特征、主体以及手段。</span><br />
<span style=\"font-size:14px;\">For a long time, China’s school education has been regarded as synonymous with indoctrination, through the definition of indoctrination and indoctrination teaching, it is concluded that China’s school education should not be completely equivalent to indoctrination, but there has been a tendency to equate China’s school education with indoctrination, which is detrimental to the teacher, the student, and the citizens of the society. Although our school education is not equivalent to indoctrination education but it does exist indoctrination education. The reform should be carried out by adopting the questioning teaching method advocated by Paulo Freire, which uses dialogue as a means of teaching, and should emphasize the characteristics, subjects and means of questioning teaching method.</span>
%K 灌输，灌输式教学，提问式教学，对话<br>Indoctrination
%K Indoctrination Teaching
%K Questioning Teaching
%K Dialogue
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=70694