%0 Journal Article
%T 认罪认罚从宽制度中逮捕适用的异化及司法偏纠<br>The Alienation of the Application of Arrest in the Plea Bargaining System and Judicial Bias Correction
%A 王子瑜
%J Advances in Social Sciences
%P 3565-3571
%@ 2169-2564
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ASS.2023.127488
%X 认罪认罚从宽制度在推广适用中出现了少数“以捕促认”和“应捕不捕”情况。这种境况是协商性司法与中国职权主义模式的内在张力之必然，检方强势主导地位与落实“少捕慎诉慎押”的硬性要求，是认罪认罚从宽制度发生偏差的重要原因。改善上述不足的路径是大力发挥检察机关公权力职能的复合化与能动化，完善逮捕审查程序，正确理解“少捕慎诉慎押”，加强羁押必要性审查主体的中立性并建立激励制度，从而有效促进良法善治。<br />
In the promotion and application of Plea Bargaining System, there are a few situations of “arrest to promote recognition” and “should be arrested without arrest”. This situation is the inevitable result of the inherent tension between the consultative justice and China’s authoritarian model, and the strong dominance of the prosecution and the implementation of the rigid requirement of “fewer arrests, more careful prosecutions, and more careful detentions” are important reasons for the deviation of the Plea Bargaining System. The path to improve the above deficiencies is to give full play to the complex and dynamic function of the public power of the procuratorial organs, improve the arrest review process, correctly understand the “less arrest and cautious detention”, strengthen the neutrality of the subject of detention necessity review and establish an incentive system, so as to effectively promote good law and good governance.
%K 认罪认罚从宽，协商司法，少捕慎诉慎押，公权力职能<br>Leniency in Pleading Guilty and Punishment
%K Consultation Justice
%K Less Arrest and Cautious Prosecution and Detention
%K Public Power Function
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=68575