%0 Journal Article
%T 先秦儒道“无为而治”的历史比较及其现实价值探析<br>The Historical Comparison and Realistic Value Analysis of the “Governance by Doing Nothing” of Confucianism and Taoism in the Pre-Qin Dynasty
%A 陈雨凡
%A 张晶
%J Advances in Philosophy
%P 1200-1205
%@ 2169-2602
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ACPP.2023.126203
%X “无为而治”是儒、道两家共同的社会治理理想状态，两者在思想基础和理想目标上具有一致性，但在具体内涵、实现途径和最终目标上仍然有很大区别。为了更好理解“无为而治”的历史意义和现实价值，对儒道两家的相关学说进行比较研究，得出儒家主张通过道德教化达到尧舜无为而治的大治局面，道家主张道法自然，尊重规律克制欲望来实现无为而治的社会状态，总结出“无为而治”对人道德修养的提升以及人与自然和谐发展上有一定现实意义。<br />
“Governing without doing anything” is the ideal state of social governance shared by Confucianism and Taoism. The two have consistency in ideological basis and ideal goal, but there are still great differences in specific connotation, realization way and ultimate goal. In order to better understand the historical significance and practical value of “governing without doing anything”, this paper makes a comparative study of the relevant theories of Confucianism and Taoism, and concludes that Confucianism advocates to achieve the great governance situation of Yao and Shun without doing anything through moral education, while Taoism advocates to follow the natural law, respect the law and restrain the desire to achieve the social state of governing without doing anything. It is concluded that “governing without doing anything” has certain practical significance to the improvement of human moral cultivation and the harmonious development of human and nature.
%K 无为而治，儒家，道家<br>Governing to Do Nothing
%K Confucianism
%K The Taoist
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=68153