%0 Journal Article
%T 高敏感人群量表中文版修订及信效度检验<br>Revision of the Chinese Version of High-Sensitivity Scale and Assessment on Reliability and Validity
%A 马婧雅
%A 肖放
%J Advances in Psychology
%P 2333-2338
%@ 2160-7281
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/AP.2023.136289
%X 目的：翻译与修订Walda (2007)改编的高敏感人群量表，以大学生为测验对象，探讨量表的因素结构并进行信效度检验。方法：按翻译程序将高敏感人群量表翻译成中文版，向大学生发放3112份问卷，并进行项目分析、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、信度分析和校标效度分析。结果：修订后的高敏感人群中文版量表包含易激发性，暴力低感觉阈限，审美敏感性三个维度，共保留11个条目，累计方差解释率为51.9%。验证性因素分析结果表明双因子模型的拟合指数(χ2 = 145.696, df = 33, CFI = 0.989, TLI = 0.982, RMSEA = 0.034, SRMR = 0.019)优于传统单维模型和三维模型。总量表的合成信度(ω)为0.83，Cronbach α系数为0.66。结论：高敏感人群量表中文修订版在我国大学生被试群体中具有较好的信效度，可用于测量我国大学生环境敏感性的有效工具。<br />
Objectives: Translation and revision of Walda’s (2007) high-sensitivity scale was conducted to examine the factor structure and reliability of the scale using university students as the test sub-jects. Methods: A total of 3112 college students were enrolled to complete the Chinese version of High-Sensitivity Scale. The structural validity of HSC-38 was tested through item analysis, explo-ratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability analysis, concur-rent validity analysis. Results: The Chinese version of High-Sensitivity Scale consisted of 11 items, and three subscales were respectively named ease of excitation, violent low sensory threshold, and aesthetic sensitivity, and a total of 11 items were retained and the cumulative variance interpretation rate was 51.9%. CFA results showed that the fit indices of the bifactor model (χ2 = 145.696, df = 33, CFI = 0.989, TLI = 0.982, RMSEA = 0.034, SRMR = 0.019) was better than the traditional unidimensional and three-dimensional models. The composite reliability (ω) of the total scale was 0.83 and the Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.66. Conclusions: The revised Chinese version of the High-Sensitivity Scale has good reliability and validity in the group of college students in China and can be used to measure the environmental sensitivity.
%K 高敏感人群，量表修订，双因子模型，大学生<br>Highly Sensitive Person
%K Scale Revision
%K Bifactor Model
%K College Students
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=67170