%0 Journal Article
%T 不同眼轴选择人工晶状体计算公式的研究进展<br>Research Progress on Selecting IOL Calculation Formulas with Different Axial Length
%A 刘岭昆
%A 穆启睿
%A 刘豫宁
%A 刘湘云
%A 赵春梅
%J Advances in Clinical Medicine
%P 4056-4062
%@ 2161-8720
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ACM.2023.133582
%X 随着屈光性白内障手术时代的到来，人工晶状体(intraocular lens, IOL)计算公式的持续更新与换代不断融合了诸如光线追踪、更先进的现代回归模型、人工智能、三维成像等新技术与新数据，在这个大背景下许多新的公式应运而生，如Barrett Universal II公式、Kane公式、Hill-radial basis (Hill-RBF)公式、Olsen公式、EVO 2.0公式和Ladas超级公式等。白内障术后的屈光准确性与眼轴的相关性主要体现在，术前准确测量眼轴参数对IOL选择最优公式来计算屈光度数的关键辅助作用。本文总结了不同眼轴应如何选择IOL度数计算公式，将其分为3个部分阐述：短眼轴选择IOL公式、长眼轴选择IOL公式、全眼轴选择IOL公式，本文根据这三个不同眼轴范畴，就包含新型公式在内的IOL计算公式准确度比较的研究进展作一综述。<br />
With the advent of refractive cataract surgery, the intraocular lens (IOL) formula continues to be updated and modernised to incorporate new technologies and data such as ray tracing, more ad-vanced modern regression models, artificial intelligence, 3D imaging, etc. Many new formulas have emerged in this context, such as the Barrett Universal II, Kane, Hill-radial basis (Hill-RBF), Olsen, EVO 2.0, and Ladas Super, etc. The correlation between refractive accuracy after cataract surgery and axial length (AL) is mainly reflected in the key role of accurate preoperative measurement of AL parameters as an aid to the selection of the optimal formula for calculating the refractive force of IOL. This paper summarises how to choose formulas for different ALs and divides them into three parts: IOL formula selection for short ALs, IOL formula selection for long ALs, IOL formula selection for full ALs. According to these three different ALs parts, this paper provides a review of the re-search progress on the comparison of the accuracy of IOL calculation formulas including some new formulas.
%K 眼轴，人工晶状体，计算公式，准确性<br>Axial Length
%K IOL
%K Calculation Formulas
%K Accuracy
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=62814