%0 Journal Article
%T 信托财产独立——比较我国与英国信托财产制度<br>Independence of Trust Property—Comparison of Trust Property System between China and Britain
%A 刘晓舟
%J Open Journal of Legal Science
%P 469-473
%@ 2329-7379
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/OJLS.2023.112067
%X 信托财产，是指受托人依据信托意图而管理和支配的财产。自信托制度诞生以来，信托财产是信托中最为重要的构成要素，可以说没有信托财产就没有信托。在大陆法系国家的概念中，信托财产想要在信托制度下发挥应有的功能，信托财产就必须具有独立性。而信托财产独立性原则并不是在英美法系衡平法环境下发展起来的，英美法系国家的信托财产制度是双重所有制原则。所以后来提出的信托财产的独立性，则与大陆法系国家民法中一物一权原则相契合，从而产生大陆法系国家的信托法制度。本文将对从属于英美法系的英国法与从属于大陆法系的我国信托法中的信托财产制度进行比较，从而对我国信托法的完善提出相应的思考。<br />
Trust property refers to the property managed and controlled by the trustee according to the trust intention. Since the birth of the trust system, trust property is the most important constituent element of trust. It can be said that there is no trust without trust property. In the concept of civil law countries, trust property must be independent if it wants to play its due role under the trust system. The principle of independence of trust property did not develop under the equity environment of Anglo-American law system. The trust property system of Anglo-American law system countries is the principle of dual ownership. Therefore, the independence of trust property proposed later is consistent with the principle of “one thing, one right” in civil law of civil law countries of continental law system, resulting in the trust law system of civil law countries. This article will compare the trust property system in the British law which is subordinate to the Anglo-American law system with that in the trust law of China which is subordinate to the continental law system, so as to put forward corresponding thoughts on the improvement of our trust law.
%K 信托财产，独立性，功能主义比较法，双重所有制，一物一权<br>Trust Property
%K Independence
%K Comparative Law of Functionalism
%K Dual Ownership
%K One Property One Right
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=62669