%0 Journal Article
%T 孕期体质量指数与子痫前期发病机制的研究<br>Study on Body Mass Index and Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia during Pregnancy
%A 李书明
%A 关红琼
%J Advances in Clinical Medicine
%P 1546-1551
%@ 2161-8720
%D 2023
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ACM.2023.132213
%X 目的：探讨孕期体质量指数(BMI)与子痫前期的相关性。方法：选择在2021.01.01~2022.10.31在海南医学院第二附属医院产科住院并分娩的符合纳入标准的50例子痫前期孕妇和50例重度子痫前期孕妇分别作为子痫前期组、重度子痫前期组，随机选择同期50例正常妊娠孕妇为对照组。比较每两组孕产妇BMI的差异性。结果：与正常组相比，子痫前期组P = 0.00047 (P &lt; 0.05)，差异具有统计学意义；重度子痫前期组P = 2.4e？05 (P &lt; 0.05)，差异具有统计学意义；三组之间进行多因素分析，P = 2.6e？05 (P &lt; 0.05)，差异具有统计学意义。子痫前期与重度子痫前期之间P = 0.19 (P &gt; 0.05)，具有组间差异。结论：子痫前期产妇BMI与正常孕妇有显著差异。BMI对于子痫前期的发生有一定的预测价值。<br />
Objective: To investigate the correlation between prenatal body mass index (BMI) and preeclamp-sia. Methods: 50 cases of pregnant women with preeclampsia and 50 cases of pregnant women with severe preeclampsia who were hospitalized and gave birth in the Obstetrics Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University from 2021.01.01 to 2022.10.31 were se-lected as the preeclampsia group and the severe preeclampsia group, respectively, and 50 normal pregnant women during the same period were randomly selected as the control group. The differ-ences in BMI between the two groups were compared. Results: Compared with normal group, preeclampsia group P = 0.00047 (P &lt; 0.05), the difference was statistically significant. In severe preeclampsia group, P = 2.4e？05 (P &lt; 0.05), the difference was statistically significant. Multivariate analysis was performed among the three groups, P = 2.6e？05 (P &lt; 0.05), and the difference was sta-tistically significant. The difference between preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia was P = 0.19 (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion: The BMI of preeclampsia women is significantly different from that of normal women. BMI has a certain predictive value for preeclampsia.
%K 体重指数，子痫前期，妊娠期高血压疾病<br>Body Mass Index
%K Pre-Eclampsia
%K Pregnancy Hypertension
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=61174