%0 Journal Article
%T 基于过程回放的急诊工作坊教学模式优化<br> Optimization of Training Mode in Emergency Comprehensive Platform Workshop Based on Process Replay
%A 柏宏华
%A 尚梦亭
%A 范浩萍
%A 廖茂祥
%A 曾海燕
%A 邢建洲
%A 吴涛
%J Nursing Science
%P 387-391
%@ 2168-5614
%D 2022
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/NS.2022.113064
%X <div style=\"text-align:justify;\">
	<span style=\"font-size:14px;\">目的：立足于前期急诊工作坊教学模式的经验，对该教学模式开展基于过程回放的流程与模式优化，进一步提高医学生急救能力培训效率。方法：将2021年进入急诊科的50名实习医学生随机分配成两组：对照组、试验组各25人。对照组采用传统的工作坊模式进行培训，试验组釆用基于过程回放的工作坊教学优化模式进行培训，培训时间均为4周，对两组学员的急救理论、技能、设备操作、突发情况应对以及院外急救知识等进行测评打分。结果：对照组学员与试验组学员在分数分布上无统计学差异(P &gt; 0.05)，结果具有可比性。对照组学员急救理论、技能、设备操作、突发情况应对以及院外急救知识的得分分别为(76.621 ± 5.132)、(77.873 ± 4.514)、(69.526 ± 6.363)、(66.372 ± 8.822)分，试验组学员得分分别为(84.726 ± 3.516)、(88.299 ± 4.726)、(84.368 ± 5.701)、(85.927 ± 6.652)分，试验组出科成绩明显高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义(P &lt; 0.01)。对照组与试验组的出科反馈评分分别为(75.353 ± 5.732)分、(90.674 ± 3.863)分，两组比较差异具有统计学意义(t = 5.290, P &lt; 0.01)。结论：与原工作坊教学模式相比，基于过程回放的急诊综合平台工作坊教学模式有效提高了医学生急救能力培训的质量与效果。</span><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><br />
Objective: Based on the early experience of the
traditional workshop teaching mode in emergency comprehensive platform, the teaching
process and methods of the training mode were optimized based on the process replaying
to further improve the training efficiency, quality and effect of medical
students’ first aid ability. Methods: 50 medical students who entered the
emergency department in 2021 were randomly divided into two groups, 25 in the
control group and other 25 in the experimental group. The traditional workshop training
mode was used in the control group, and the optimized training model based on
process replay was used in the experimental group. The training time of both
groups was 4 weeks. The first-aid theory, skills, equipment operation,
emergency response and first-aid knowledge of the two groups were
comprehensively evaluated and scored. Results: There was no significant
difference in score distribution between the control group and the experimental
group (P &gt; 0.05). The scores of first aid theory, skills, equipment
operation, emergency response and first aid knowledge of the students in the
control group were (76.621 ± 5.132), (77.873 ± 4.514), (69.526 ± 6.363), (66.372 ± 8.822) respectively, and the scores of the students in the experimental
group were (84.726 ± 3.516), (88.299 ± 4.726), (84.368 ± 5.701), (85.927 ± 6.652) respectively. The graduation scores of the experimental group
were significantly higher than those of the control group. The difference was
statistically significant (P &lt; 0.01). The graduation feedback scores of the control group and the experimental group were (75.353 ± 5.732) and (90.674 ± 3.863) respectively. There was significant difference between the two groups (t = 5.290, P &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: Compared with the traditional workshop training mode, the emergency comprehensive platform
%K 急诊，工作坊，过程回放，教学培训<br> Emergency Department
%K Workshop
%K Process Replay
%K Teaching and Training
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=52884