%0 Journal Article
%T Feature-Tracking Strain Derived from Compressed Sensing Cine Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Infarct Detection: A Feasibility Study
%A Tomoro Morikawa
%A Yuki Tanabe
%A Tomoyuki Kido
%A Ryo Ogawa
%A Masashi Nakamura
%A Sho Akasaka
%A Kouki Watanabe
%A Michaela Schmidt
%A Osamu Yamaguchi
%A Teruhito Kido
%J Open Journal of Radiology
%P 101-114
%@ 2164-3032
%D 2021
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ojrad.2021.113010
%X Purpose: This study aimed to use gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) scanning to examine the clinical feasibility of feature-tracking strain (FT-strain) analysis on compressed sensing (CS) cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for detecting myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: We enrolled 37 patients who underwent conventional cine CMR, CS cine CMR, and LGE-CMR scanning to assess cardiovascular disease. FT-strain analysis was used to assess peak circumferential strain (p-CS) based on an 18-segment model in both cine CMR imaging modalities. Based on LGE-CMR imaging findings, myocardial segments were classified as remote, adjacent, subendocardial infarcted, and transmural infarcted. The diagnostic performance of p-CS for detecting MI was compared between CS cine CMR imaging and conventional cine CMR imaging using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: A total of 440 remote, 85 adjacent, 76 subendocardial infarcted, and 65 transmural infarcted segments were diagnosed on LGE-CMR imaging. There were significant between-group differences in p-CS on both conventional and CS cine CMR (p < 0.05 in each) imaging. The sensitivity and specificity of p-CS for identifying MI were 85% and 79% for conventional cine CMR imaging, and 82% and 77% for CS cine CMR imaging, respectively. There was no significant difference between conventional and CS cine CMR imaging in the area under the curve of p-CS (0.89 vs. 0.87, p = 0.15). Conclusion: FT-strain analysis of CS cine CMR imaging may help identify MI; it may be used alongside or instead of conventional CMR imaging.
%K Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
%K Cardiac Function
%K Compressed Sensing
%K Myocardial Infarction
%K Myocardial Strain
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=112083