%0 Journal Article
%T 口腔溃疡患者的临床口腔护理干预的应用效果研究<br> Study on the Effect of Clinical Oral Nursing Intervention for Patients with Oral Ul-cers
%A 陈要武
%J Nursing Science
%P 235-240
%@ 2168-5614
%D 2021
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/NS.2021.103039
%X <div style=\"text-align:justify;\">
	<span style=\"font-size:14px;\">目的：探讨口腔溃疡患者重视临床口腔多元化护理干预方案的实施效果及价值。方法：选取口腔溃疡患者100例，均为我院2019年2月至2020年2月期间收治，应用数字表抽取法进行随机分组，就采取临床常规护理模式(对照组，n = 50)与采取临床多元化口腔护理干预模式(观察组，n = 50)口腔疼痛、异味评分，溃疡愈合及恢复正常进食时间、生活质量评分、满意度情况展开对比。结果：两组在护理前，口腔疼痛、异味测评分值无差异(P &gt; 0.05)，护理后，各项分值均有降低，且相较对照组，观察组变化更为明显，差异具有统计学意义(P &lt; 0.05)。观察组护理后溃疡愈合时间、恢复至正常进食时间经观测均少于对照组，差异具有统计学意义(P &lt; 0.05)。两组在护理前，生活质量测评分值无差异(P &gt; 0.05)，护理后，分值均有升高，且相较对照组，观察组变化更为明显，差异具有统计学意义(P &lt; 0.05)；在两组患者的满意度比较中，观察组50例患者的总满意度为48例(96.00%)，对照组50例患者的总满意度为41例(82.00%)，观察组患者总满意度显著高于对照组，两组对比差异明显P &lt; 0.05。结论：针对口腔溃疡患者积极开展临床口腔多元化护理干预，可减轻口腔疼痛、异味程度，缩短溃疡愈合及恢复至正常进食的时间，提高生活质量，开展价值较为突出。</span><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><br />
Objective: To explore the effect and
value of clinical oral diversified nursing intervention for patients with oral
ulcer. Methods: A total of 100 patients with oral ulcer who were admitted to
our hospital from February 2019 to February 2020 were randomly divided into two
groups: clinical routine nursing mode (control group, n = 50) and clinical
diversified oral nursing intervention mode (observation group, n = 50) for oral
pain and odor score. Ulcer healing and normal eating time, quality of life
score, satisfaction were compared. Results: Before nursing, there was no
difference in oral pain and odor test scores between the two groups (P </span><span style=\"font-size:14px;\">&gt; 0 0.05). After
nursing, all scores were decreased, and compared with the control group, the
change in the observation group was more obvious, the difference was
statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05). After nursing, the healing time of ulcer and the time to return to normal eating in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05). Before nursing, there was no difference in life quality assessment scores between the two groups (P &gt; 0 0.05), after nursing, the scores were
increased, and compared with the control group, the change of observation group
was more obvious, the difference was statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05). In the comparison of patient satisfaction between the two groups, the total satisfaction of the 50 patients in the observation group was 48 cases (96.00%), and the total satisfaction of the 50 patients in the control group was 41 cases (82.00%). The total satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference between the two groups was significant (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: For patients with oral ulcer, actively carrying
%K 口腔溃疡，临床口腔护理干预，愈合时间，生活质量<br> Oral Ulcer
%K Clinical Oral Care Intervention
%K Healing Time
%K Quality of Life
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=43527