%0 Journal Article
%T 网络成瘾的干预研究述评<br>Review of Intervention Research on Internet Addiction
%A 常雅娟
%J Advances in Psychology
%P 978-986
%@ 2160-7281
%D 2021
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/AP.2021.114110
%X 目的：对现有网络成瘾的干预研究进行系统性分析和比较，为网络成瘾的干预实践提供理论依据。方法：文献分析和归纳总结。结果：对网络成瘾的干预主要有单一干预模式和综合干预模式，其中单一干预模式有心理干预、医学药物干预、社会干预、体育干预等，其中以心理干预为主要模式。讨论：总体上现有干预模式对网络成瘾症状的改善都起到了一定的积极作用，但也存在一定的局限性，表现在：现有干预模式存在干预主体多元化，干预方法多样化，但因干预主体和研究者理论取向不同，现有干预研究缺乏系统性，研究者对于网络成瘾的概念、病与非病的性质界定存在争议、网络成瘾评估以及干预效果评估手段不统一，影响干预效果的比较，可推广性不强。<br />
Objective: To systematically analyze and compare the existing intervention studies on Internet addiction, so as to provide theoretical basis for the practice of Internet addiction intervention. Methods: Literature analysis and summarization. Results: There are single intervention mode and comprehensive intervention mode for Internet addiction. The single intervention mode includes psychological intervention, medical drug intervention, social intervention, sports intervention, etc., among which psychological intervention is the main mode. Discussion: On the whole the existing intervention mode on the improvement of the symptoms of Internet addiction has played a positive role, but also has certain limitation, displays in: existing diversification of intervention model, and intervention method diversification, but due to the different intervention in the subject and the theory orientation, the existing lack of systemic intervention study, the researchers for the concept of Internet addiction, disease, and define the nature of the disease is controversial, Internet addiction assessment and intervention effect assessment method, influence the effect of intervention, potential replication is not strong.
%K 网络成瘾，干预研究，述评<br>Internet Addiction
%K Intervention Research
%K Review
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=41873