%0 Journal Article
%T THE COMPARISON WITH EXEGETES¡¯ COMMENT AND CRITIC OF MUHAMMAD ESED¡¯S APOLOGETICAL COMMENT ABOUT BATTLE-PLUNDER RELATIONSHIP
%A Bayram Ayhan
%J -
%D 2019
%X Muhammad Asad (d. 1992) says that Muslims can make a battle only for aim of defence and they can take prisoner/plunder through a cutthroad battle based on justified reason. It must be convinced this this opinion, he make socio-political two dissident opinion against jumhur (the majority of exegetes) and says that taking slave without a legitimate battle will be wrong and killing battle slaves will be great sin. Despite there is an disagreement between exegetes they doesn¡¯t make acommentary similar to his commentary. Conversely the most of them say that hasn¡¯tkilling of slaves will be a big sin. Furthermore, the commentary that taking slaves without a legitimate battle is not accurate according to the historical datas ocur before the Bedir Battle. The commentary that the killing of slaves will be a big sin iscontradict with right rumor and exegetes¡¯ preferred comments. This article aim toexplain Muhammad Asad¡¯s comments comparative reading the commentary literature
%K Tefsir
%K Sava£¿
%K Apolojetik Yorum
%K Muhammed Esed
%K Sava£¿
%K Esir
%U http://dergipark.org.tr/abuifd/issue/45593/523625