%0 Journal Article
%T Assessing Adult Attachment: Relation and Validity of two Dynamic-Maturational Model Approaches
%A Albert L. Pace
%A Rodger K. Bufford
%J -
%D 2018
%R 10.5964/ijpr.v12i2.318
%X Assessing attachment is essential yet challenging. The Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) provides the best appraisal of adult attachment but is time-intensive and costly. Likewise, concerns have been raised regarding the Berkeley-AAI coding and classification method. Meanwhile, self-report measures of adult attachment are time-efficient and low-cost, but their validity is questionable. The Dynamic-Maturational Model approach to the AAI (DMM-AAI) and a novel self-report measure ¨C the Attachment Relationship Questionaire (ARQ) ¨C may offer a solution. However, additional investigations regarding the validity of DMM-AAI are needed and the ARQ¡¯s psychometric properties have not be tested. The validity of the DMM approach to the AAI and the predictive relationship between the ARQ and DMM-AAI classification were examined for 212 participants living the UK. Results indicated a strong positive relationship between high numbered attachment classification on the DMM-AAI and psychological treatment status, ¦Ö2(6) = 56.07, p < .001; Cramer¡¯s V = .371, p < .001. Binomial logistic regressions between the ARQ and DMM-AAI found both single-statement and multi-statement predictive models were statistically significant. However, the ARQ accounted for only a small amount of the variance (R2 ¡Ü 0.15). In conclusion, the DMM-AAI demonstrated strong construct validity, whereas the ARQ is not useful for assessment of adult attachment. Further investigation with a revised version of the ARQ that addresses psychometric concerns is suggested
%K [attachment
%K adult attachment interview
%K dynamic-maturational model
%K self-report]
%U https://interpersona.psychopen.eu/index.php/interpersona/article/view/3571