%0 Journal Article %T Economic evaluation of a brief counselling for smoking cessation in dentistry: a case study comparing two health economic models %A Inna Feldman %A Maria R Galanti %A Pia M Johansson %A Suvi Erika Virtanen %J - %D 2017 %R 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016375 %X Objectives This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness estimates of a brief counselling of smoking cessation in dentistry by using two different health economic models. Design and outcome measures Intervention effectiveness was estimated in a cluster randomised controlled trial. The number of quitters was estimated based on 7-day abstinence and on smoking reduction at follow-up. Health economic evaluation was performed using two models: (1) a population-based model employing potential impact fractions and (2) a Markov model estimating the cost-effectiveness of the intervention for the actual participants. The evaluation was performed from healthcare and societal perspectives, and health gains were expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Setting Dental clinics in Sweden. Participants 205 Swedish smokers aged 20¨C75 years. Interventions A brief, structured behavioural intervention was compared with ¡®usual care¡¯. Results The cost per quitter was US$552 in the intervention and US$522 in the ¡®usual care¡¯ condition. The net saving estimated with the population-based model was US$17.3£¿million for intervention and US$49.9£¿million for ¡®usual care¡¯, with health gains of 1428 QALYs and 2369 QALYs, respectively, for the whole Swedish population during 10 years. The intervention was thus dominated by ¡®usual care¡¯. The reverse was true when using the Markov model, showing net societal savings of US$71£¿000 for the intervention and US$57000 for ¡®usual care¡¯, with gains of 5.42 QALYs and 4.74 QALYs, respectively, for lifelong quitters. Conclusion The comparison of intervention and ¡®usual care¡¯ derived from small-scale studies may be highly sensitive to the choice of the model used to calculate cost-effectiveness. Trial registration The cluster randomised trial is registered in the ISRCTN register of controlled trials with identification number [ISRCTN50627997][1]. [1]: /external-ref?link_type=ISRCTN&access_num=ISRCTN5062799 %U https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/7/e016375