%0 Journal Article
%T Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis
%A Alan Bill
%A Ganesh Bavikatte
%A Heather Williams
%A Keith Sephton
%A Lynne Turner-Stokes
%J -
%D 2016
%R 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012112
%X Objectives To evaluate functional outcomes, care needs and cost-efficiency of hyperacute (HA) rehabilitation for a cohort of in-patients with complex neurological disability and unstable medical/surgical conditions.

Design A multicentre cohort analysis of prospectively collected clinical data from the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative (UKROC) national clinical database, 2012¨C2015.

Setting Two HA specialist rehabilitation services in England, providing different service models for HA rehabilitation.

Participants All patients admitted to each of the units with an admission rehabilitation complexity M score of ¡Ý3 (N=190; mean age 46 (SD16) years; males:females 63:37%). Diagnoses were acquired brain injury (n=166; 87%), spinal cord injury (n=9; 5%), peripheral neurological conditions (n=9; 5%) and other (n=6; 3%).

Intervention Specialist in-patient multidisciplinary rehabilitation combined with management and stabilisation of intercurrent medical and surgical problems.

Outcome measures Rehabilitation complexity and medical acuity: Rehabilitation Complexity Scale¡ªversion 13. Dependency and care costs: Northwick Park Dependency Scale/Care Needs Assessment (NPDS/NPCNA). Functional independence: UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM). Primary outcomes: (1) reduction in dependency and (2) cost-efficiency, measured as the time taken to offset rehabilitation costs by savings in NPCNA-estimated costs of on-going care in the community.

Results The mean length of stay was 103 (SD66) days. Some differences were observed between the two units, which were in keeping with the different service models. However, both units showed a significant reduction in dependency and acuity between admission and discharge on all measures (Wilcoxon: p<0.001). For the 180 (95%) patients with complete NPCNA data, the mean episode cost was ¡ê77£¿119 (bootstrapped 95% CI ¡ê70£¿614 to ¡ê83£¿894) and the mean reduction in ¡®weekly care costs¡¯ was ¡ê462/week (95% CI 349 to 582). The mean time to offset the cost of rehabilitation was 27.6£¿months (95% CI 13.2 to 43.8).

Conclusions Despite its relatively high initial cost, specialist HA rehabilitation can be highly cost-efficient, producing substantial savings in on-going care costs, and relieving pressure in the acute care services
%U https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/9/e012112