%0 Journal Article
%T Different Arguments, Same Problems. Modal Ambiguity and Tricky Substitutions
%A Urbaniak
%A Rafal
%J -
%D 2017
%R 10.31820/ejap.13.2.1
%X Sa£¿etak I illustrate with three classical examples the mistakes arising from using a modal operator admitting multiple interpretations in the same argument; the flaws arise especially easily if no attention is paid to the range of propositional variables. Premisses taken separately might seem convincing and a substitution for a propositional variable in a modal context might seem legitimate. But there is no single interpretation of the modal operators involved under which all the premisses are plausible and the substitution successful
%K Church-Fitch paradox
%K futura contingentia
%K modal logic
%K modal operators
%K propositional quantification
%K Swinburne¡¯s modal argument
%U https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=299300