%0 Journal Article
%T Speaking of the Ineffable, East and West
%A Priest
%A Graham
%J -
%D 2015
%X Sa£¿etak There is a phenomenon that often arises when a philosophy argues that there are limits to thought/language, and tries to jus- tify this view by giving reasons as to why there are things about which one cannot think/talk¡ªin the process appearing to give the lie to the claim. I will be concerned with that phenomenon. We will look at some of philosophies that fall into this camp (those of Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and Mah £¿ay £¿ana Buddhism). We will then see that Buddhist philosophy has resources to address this kind of issue not present in Western tradi- tions, namely the catu.sko.ti and its develop- ments. The catu.sko.ti is a principle to the effect that claims can be true, false, both, or neither. Later developments add a fifth pos- sibility: ineffability. Of course, one might be skeptical that such ideas can be made log- ically respectable. I will show how to do so with some simple tools from contemporary non-classical logi
%K ineffability
%K Wittgenstein
%K Hei- degger
%K Mahayana Buddhism
%U https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=238608