%0 Journal Article
%T 不同管径胸腔引流管对原发性自发性气胸的治疗效果比较<br>Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of Different Diameter Chest Tube on Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax
%A 楚师成
%A 高俊苹
%A 高学军
%A 吴天宇
%A 宋云浩
%J Advances in Clinical Medicine
%P 1483-1488
%@ 2161-8720
%D 2020
%I Hans Publishing
%R 10.12677/ACM.2020.107223
%X <div style=\"text-align:justify;\">
	目的：研究不同管径胸腔引流管对原发性自发行气胸的治疗效果，为临床医生提供经验。方法：应用对照研究的方法，记录50名患者在应用不同引流管行胸腔闭式引流术后不同时间的疼痛评分、X线结果及带管时间，运用统计学软件进行分析。结果：两组术后1 h、3 h、24 h、48 h疼痛评分及术后1 h肺复张情况比较有统计学意义(P &lt; 0.05)；两组间术后24 h肺复张情况及带管时间比较无统计学意义(P &gt; 0.05)。结论：中心静脉导管在治疗原发性自发性气胸中有独特的优势，可优先考虑。<br />
Objective: To study the effect of different diameter Chest tube on primary spontaneous pneumothorax, and to provide experience for clinicians. Methods: Using Methods of controlled study to record 50 patients’ pain score, x-ray results and time after thoracic closed drainage with different drainage tube, then using statistical software. Results: The pain scores at 1 h, 3 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation and the pulmonary reinflation at 1 h after operation were statistically significant (p &gt; 0.05), and the pulmonary reinflation and the duct time at 24 h after operation were not statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Central Venous Catheter has a unique advantage in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax and should be given priority.
</div>
%K 气胸，胸腔闭式引流，不同管径<br>Pneumatothorax
%K Closed Drainage of Thoracic Cavity
%K Different Pipe Diameters
%U http://www.hanspub.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=36745