%0 Journal Article
%T A Meta
%A Alexander Moe
%A Hansel Burley
%A Mingxiao Sui
%A Yunjuan Luo
%J Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
%@ 2161-430X
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/1077699018804500
%X This study used rigorous meta-analytic approaches to analyze empirical agenda-setting studies published from 1972 to 2015, and 67 studies that met the inclusion criteria for analysis produced a moderate grand mean effect size of 0.487. A multiple regression analysis revealed one most notable predictor that classified the basis for the study correlation as either content categories or survey participants. A multiple regression of a subgroup using content categories produced homogeneity. The mean effect size for these studies was 0.51. This is an indication of consistency in findings across agenda-setting studies and the presence of strong news media¡¯s public agenda-setting effects
%K agenda setting
%K meta-analysis
%K media agenda
%K public agenda
%K news media
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1077699018804500