%0 Journal Article
%T Psychologists psychologizing scientific psychology: An epistemological reading of the replication crisis
%A Ivan Flis
%J Theory & Psychology
%@ 1461-7447
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/0959354319835322
%X In this article, I critically discuss the philosophy and psychology of science that are put forward by psychologists involved in the reform debates centered on the so-called ¡°replication crisis¡± of the 2010s. Following the historian of psychology Laurence Smith, I describe the psychologists¡¯ conception of the science system and individual psychology of the scientist as an ¡°indigenous epistemology.¡± By first describing the indigenous epistemology of the reform movement, my aim is to constructively criticize it by making explicit how psychologists psychologize scientific psychology, and pointing to where such psychologizing needs more conceptual work, especially when it uses the work of philosophers of science. In their writing, the reformers tentatively subscribe to various positions on ways of knowing and functioning of the science system which exhibit fundamental inconsistencies. I suggest some ways for improving and deepening the discussion of epistemological positions that are taken in the replication crisis debates
%K history of psychology
%K indigenous epistemology of irrationality
%K naturalism in epistemology
%K philosophy of science
%K replication crisis
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0959354319835322