%0 Journal Article
%T Monitoring Moral Virtue: When the Moral Transgressions of In
%A Chi-yue Chiu
%A Joubyr Amrani Idrissi
%A Karim Bettache
%A Ruben George Jonathan Amenyogbo
%A Takeshi Hamamura
%J Journal of Cross
%@ 1552-5422
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/0022022118814687
%X Literature indicates that people tend to judge the moral transgressions committed by out-group members more severely than those of in-group members. However, these transgressions often conflate a moral transgression with some form of intergroup harm. There is little research examining in-group versus out-group transgressions of harmless offenses, which violate moral standards that bind people together (binding foundations). As these moral standards center around group cohesiveness, a transgression committed by an in-group member may be judged more severely. The current research presented Dutch Muslims (Study 1), American Christians (Study 2), and Indian Hindus (Study 3) with a set of fictitious stories depicting harmless and harmful moral transgressions. Consistent with our expectations, participants who strongly identified with their religious community judged harmless moral offenses committed by in-group members, relative to out-group members, more severely. In contrast, this effect was absent when participants judged harmful moral transgressions. We discuss the implications of these results
%K moral
%K foundations
%K judgment
%K Muslim
%K Christian
%K Hindu
%K in-group
%K out-group
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0022022118814687