%0 Journal Article
%T Reframing PaulĄ¯s Anthropology in the Light of the Dichotomies of Pauline Research
%A Volker Rabens
%J Journal for the Study of the New Testament
%@ 1745-5294
%D 2018
%R 10.1177/0142064X18769518
%X The history of Pauline research has uncovered, as well as created, several dualisms, false dichotomies and cul-de-sacs that have played and still play a role in various interpretations of Paul. Susan EastmanĄ¯s Paul and the Person (2017) sets out to reframe PaulĄ¯s anthropology by opening a discursive window between Pauline scholarship and recent work in developmental psychology and neuroscience. In this article I discuss how Eastman manages to achieve this goal ¨C by looking at her monograph from the perspective of five interpretative dichotomies: individual vs communal, Stoic vs Platonic and material vs immaterial, cognition vs emotion, relational vs ontological transformation, and human vs divine agency
%K Pauline Studies
%K anthropology
%K human and divine agency
%K cosmology
%K participation
%K emotion
%K transformation
%K Stoicism
%K ontology
%K body
%K relationships
%K mimesis
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0142064X18769518