%0 Journal Article
%T Elasticity at the Canada¨CUS border: Jurisdiction, rights, accountability
%A Emily Gilbert
%J Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
%@ 2399-6552
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/2399654418787190
%X Borders are being stretched as they are deterritorialized, reterritorialized and extra-territorialized. But borders are not only being relocated elsewhere: just as they are extended they are also snapped back into place in order to limit the rights of travellers and migrants, and to deny the accountability of border officials. This elasticity¡ªexpansion but also contraction¡ªis the focus of this paper, with particular attention to the Canada¨CUS border with respect to how legal jurisdiction is being reworked territorially, and the ways that the law gets attached to particular bodies. Three contemporary case studies are examined: the Safe Third Country Agreement, the Shiprider program, and the expansion of preclearance programs. While each of these cases is quite different in that they deal with asylum seekers, cross-border policing, and extra-territorial customs programs, together they illustrate how borders are being made elastic, and with what political implications
%K Borders
%K Canada
%K United States
%K jurisdiction
%K accountability
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2399654418787190