%0 Journal Article
%T A Managed
%A Courtney Wolf
%A Daniel Berkovits
%A David M. Burgy
%A Maria Jessa Cruz
%A Pooya Ghorbani
%A Renata Silberblatt
%A Simon McDonnell
%A Swati Desai
%J The American Review of Public Administration
%@ 1552-3357
%D 2019
%R 10.1177/0275074018804663
%X Research shows that resilient communities are best achieved through active public participation, informed by local input. However, post-disaster strategies in the United States are typically federally led and top-down in nature. We present an exploratory case study of resilience planning in New York State in the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy, which is a combination of public participation and government supervision. We name this approach ¡°managed-participation¡± because it emphasizes engaging the public in post-disaster planning, guided by a high degree of state-level leadership. We adapt a theoretical proposition of horizontal and vertical integration framework for an exploratory analysis of the case. We find that New York¡¯s approach contributes to both horizontal and vertical integration of impacted communities by enhancing active participation in resilience efforts, and taking advantage of the state government¡¯s position to connect local needs with federal funding. Furthermore, by utilizing expertise and funding support to guide and translate local knowledge, it produces potentially more viable resilience plans
%K resilience planning
%K disaster recovery
%K managed-participatory
%K horizontal and vertical integration
%K NYRCR
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0275074018804663