%0 Journal Article
%T The Path Taken and Not Taken in Social Epistemology
%A Steve Fuller
%J Philosophy of the Social Sciences
%@ 1552-7441
%D 2018
%R 10.1177/0048393118794994
%X I respond to William Lynch¡¯s critique of the sympathetic reading of my work provided by Remedios and Dusek in Knowing Humanity in the Social World: The Path of Steve Fuller¡¯s Social Epistemology. Lynch harks back to my early works, which he sees as a promoting a ¡®naturalism¡¯ lacking in the later works. In response, I observe that my commitment to naturalism has always been ¡®reflexive¡¯, which has led me to break with conventional forms of naturalism, though sticking closely to the spirit of science
%K Hegel
%K Kant
%K naturalism
%K reflexivity
%K Scientific Revolution
%K social epistemology
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0048393118794994