%0 Journal Article
%T Erratum: Restoration increases bee abundance and richness but not pollination in remnant and post©\agricultural woodland
%J Ecosphere - Wiley Online Library
%D 2019
%R https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2560
%X In the paper by S. Breland et al. (ˇ°Restoration increases bee abundance and richness but not pollination in remnant and post©\agricultural woodlandˇ±; Ecosphere 9(9):02435), errors in the analyses of floral cover and flower species richness have been identified by the authors. The authors regret the errors. Three areas in the text are affected by these errors, as follows here below. First, in Results: Response of bee and floral communities, the sentence reading ˇ°Thinning also increased floral cover by 699% (Table 1, Fig. 3) and floral richness by 232% (Table 1)ˇ± should instead read ˇ°Thinning also increased floral cover by 552% (Table 1, Fig. 3) and floral richness by 201% (Table 1).ˇ± Second, later in the same paragraph, the sentence reading ˇ°There was a significant interaction between land use and restoration on floral cover (Table 1), such that floral cover increased to a greater degree when remnant plots were thinned (5389%), relative to when post©\agricultural plots were thinned (275%; Fig. 3)ˇ± should be considered deleted. Third, in Discussion, the paragraph beginning ˇ°We hypothesize that the land use by restoration interaction effect on floral coverˇ­ˇ± should be considered deleted. In addition, corrected versions of Table 1 and Fig. 3 are as follows
%U https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ecs2.2560