%0 Journal Article
%T High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training within cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
%A Amanda L Hannan
%A James Furness
%A Jeff S Coombes
%A Joshua Byrnes
%A Mike Climstein
%A Rohan Jayasinghe
%A Vini Simas
%A Wayne Hing
%J Archive of "Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine".
%D 2018
%R 10.2147/OAJSM.S150596
%X Aerobic capacity has been shown to be inversely proportionate to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and there is growing evidence that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) appears to be more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in improving cardiorespiratory fitness within the cardiac population. Previously published systematic reviews in cardiovascular disease have neither investigated the effect that the number of weeks of intervention has on cardiorespiratory fitness changes, nor have adverse events been collated
%K coronary artery disease
%K cardiac rehabilitation
%K interval training
%K exercise
%K intensity
%K physical therapy
%K cardiovascular disease
%U https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790162/