%0 Journal Article
%T Comparison of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines for the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility at a University teaching hospital in Nairobi, Kenya: a cross-sectional study
%A Ali Kassim
%A Geoffrey Omuse
%A Zul Premji
%J Archive of "Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials".
%D 2016
%R 10.1186/s12941-016-0135-3
%X The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines are the most popular breakpoint guidelines used in antimicrobial susceptibility testing worldwide. The EUCAST guidelines are freely available to users while CLSI is available for non-members as a package of three documents for US $500 annually. This is prohibitive for clinical microbiology laboratories in resource poor settings. We set out to compare antibiotic susceptibility determined by the two guidelines to determine whether adoption of EUCAST guidelines would significantly affect our susceptibility patterns
%K European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)
%K Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)
%K Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)
%K Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC)
%U https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4827198/