%0 Journal Article
%T Short-term clinical outcomes and long-term survival of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting
%A Fabio De Robertis
%A Melissa Rochon
%A Shahzad G. Raja
%A Sheena Garg
%A Siobhan Daley
%A Toufan Bahrami
%J Archive of "Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery".
%D 2018
%R 10.21037/acs.2018.06.14
%X Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting is regarded as an alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) through full sternotomy, particularly for patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery stenosis deemed unsuitable for percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the technically demanding nature of the procedure and lack of long-term published outcomes have precluded its universal adoption. We report the comparative short-term outcomes and long-term survival of MIDCAB and conventional CABG through full sternotomy for grafting of isolated LAD
%K Proximal left anterior descending artery
%K minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB grafting)
%K minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB)
%K minimally invasive revascularization
%K left internal mammary artery (LIMA)
%U https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219940/