%0 Journal Article
%T Diagnosis of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: Discordant results by diagnostic methods
%A Deborah Milimo
%A Helen Ayles
%A Maina C. Lengwe
%A Maureen M. Chilufya
%A Monde Muyoyeta
%A Nkatya Kasese
%A Petra de Haas
%A Stembiso Munkondya
%A Winnie Mwanza
%J Archive of "African Journal of Laboratory Medicine".
%D 2018
%R 10.4102/ajlm.v7i2.806
%X The performance of the Xpert£¿ MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus assays for the detection of rifampicin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis was compared to culture-based drug susceptibility testing in 30 specimens with rifampicin-resistant and rifampicin-indeterminate Xpert MTB/RIF results collected between March 2012 and March 2014. Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus were 100% sensitive and 100% concordant for rifampicin resistance detection, but 3 of 13 samples (23%) positive for rifampicin resistance on Xpert MTB/RIF and MTBDRplus were negative for rifampicin resistance on mycobacteria growth indicator tube drug susceptibility testing. Specificity was 72% for Xpert MTB/RIF and 80% for MTBDRplus. Positive predictive value for Xpert MTB/RIF for multidrug resistant tuberculosis was 47.8% for new patients and 77.8% for previously treated patients; negative predictive value was 100% for both new and previously treated patients. The discordant rifampicin resistance test results indicate a need to fully characterise circulating rifampicin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Zambia and to inform the development of guidelines for decision-making in relation to diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis
%U https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6295983/