%0 Journal Article
%T Activity of Isoxaflutole plus Metribuzin Tankmixes in Isoxaflutole-Resistant Soybean
%A Andrea Smith
%A Nader Soltani
%A David C. Hooker
%A Darren E. Robinson
%A Allan C. Kaastra
%A Peter H. Sikkema
%J American Journal of Plant Sciences
%P 1350-1373
%@ 2158-2750
%D 2019
%I Scientific Research Publishing
%R 10.4236/ajps.2019.108097
%X Isoxaflutole-resistant soybean is currently in
development for commercialization in North America. Proposals to use
isoxaflutole + metribuzin as the main herbicide tank-mixture raise concerns as
there is limited grass control with these herbicides. Strategies are needed to
improve grass control with isoxaflutole + metribuzin. <span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">Nine
experiments were conducted over a two-year period (2017,</span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">2018)</span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">to determine the efficacy of
isoxaflutole + metribuzin (52.5 + 210 g</span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">a，</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">i<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;white-space:normal;\">，</span></span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">ha</span><sup><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">-</span></sup></span><sup><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">1</span></sup><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">)</span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">applied alone and</span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">co</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">-applied
with pendimethalin, dimethenamid-P, pethoxamid,
pyroxasulfone</span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">or</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\"> S-metolachlor applied preemergence (PRE).
Comparisons were made with isoxaflutole + metribuzin at a </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">low rate (52.5 + 210 </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">g</span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">a，</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">i<span style=\"font-family:Verdana;white-space:normal;\">，</span></span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">ha</span><sup><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">-</span></sup></span><sup><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">1</span></sup><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">), medium rate (79 + 315</span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">g</span><span style=\"font-family:;\" \"=\"\"> </span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">a，</span><span style=\"font-family:Verdana;\">i<span
%K Glyphosate Resistance
%K HPPD Transgenic Soybean Cultivars
%K Preemergence Herbicides
%K Rainfall
%K Soybean Yield
%K Weed Management
%U http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=94589