%0 Journal Article
%T 收入收敛、技术收敛与区域发展差异——基于中国地级市的空间计量分析<br>Income Convergence， Technology Convergence and Disparity in Regional Development： Based on Spatial Econometric Analysis of Chinese Prefecture-level Cities
%A 魏建国　胡绍波　郭　晨
%J 华中师范大学报（人文社会科学版）
%D 2017
%X 摘要 本文使用了中国地级市的数据，通过对比收入收敛和技术收敛两类研究方法研究了中国区域发展差异问题，发现：(1)单纯地把各个地理单元视作封闭的经济体，不考虑各个经济体之间的经济、地理的关联性，将会低估区域经济的收敛性，忽视了区域间的相互影响，而做出错误的判断；(2)在全国范围内存在显著的收敛趋势，而且收入收敛速度慢于技术收敛速度，区域发展差异的主要来源是来自技术差异；(3)分东、中、西部及城市群样本回归发现，区域间发展差异较大，总体来说东部地区发展比中西部地区经济发展更具有平衡性。因此，制定区域协调发展政策要注重对落后地区实行技术激励导向型的政策。<br>Abstract：The paper uses China’s prefecture-level city data to analyze the differences of China’s regional development level by comparing two different convergence methods， namely， income convergence and technology convergence. The main findings are as follows. (1) If each geographic unit is taken as a closed economy， ignoring the economic and geographical correlation between each economy， the convergence will be overlooked， which leads to misunderstanding. (2)Within the whole country， the convergence is significant. And it is also found that the convergence of technology is faster than that of income. The difference of technology contributes most to the development gap of different cities. (3)The paper also finds considerable graphical differences by regressing the city group using the eastern， middle and western city groups. Generally speaking， the economy of the eastern part is more balanced than the middle or western part. Thus， when making regional coordinated development policy， one must lay more stress on technology incentive oriented policies.
%U http://journal.ccnu.edu.cn/sk/CN/abstract/abstract5589.shtml