%0 Journal Article
%T “情”为何物？ ——反思公共领域研究的理性主义范式<br>What is the “Emotion”: The Re?ection on the Paradigm of Rationalism in Research of Public Sphere
%A 袁光锋
%J 国际新闻界
%D 2016
%X 摘要 在公共领域的研究中以哈贝马斯为代表的理性主义范式被最广泛使用。近些年来，这一范式遭到越来越多的反思和批判。本文回顾和比较了对理性主义范式进行反思的几种以“情感”为视角的路径。其中，弗雷泽回应了哈贝马斯的公共领域理论，提倡多元的公共领域模式。围绕这一研究，有学者将“情感”视为一种公共实践的方式；林郁沁等学者将“公众”视为一种具体的历史的构成，讨论了“情感”与“公众”形成之关系，以及公众情感与政治权威的互动；克劳斯、纳斯鲍姆等反对“认知—情感”的二元对立模式。克劳斯提出了“一种新的激情政治”，将理性与情感容纳在一起，指出情感在理性判断中的作用。本文最后指出了“情感”视角对于理解公共领域以及当代中国公共领域的意义。<br>The paradigm of rationalism represented by Habermas is the most widely-used in the research of public sphere, which has been suffering from increasing criticism in recent years. The paper is to review some re?ection with the perspective of “emotion”. Fraser had advocated the model of multiple publics. Based on this research, some scholars treated “emotion” as one kind of public practice. Eugenia regarded the “public” as concrete history formation and discussed the relationship between “emotion” and the formation of the “public”. Krause and Nussbaum rejected the binary oppositions model of “cognition and emotion”. Krause proposed a new kind of politics of passion and pointed out the role of emotion in rational judgment. The paper also discusses the meaning of the perspective of “emotion” in research of public sphere in contemporary China
%K 公共领域
%K 理性主义
%K 情感
%K 哈贝马斯<br>public sphere
%K rationalism
%K emotion
%K Habermas
%U http://cjjc.ruc.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract587.shtml