%0 Journal Article
%T 高校师生对原始分制与标准分制的感知对比<br>A Comparative Study of College Teachers and Students’ Perceptions of Raw Score and Z-score
%A 林
%A 椿
%A 肖云南
%J 大学教育科学
%D 2017
%X 我国高校课程考试很少采用标准分来报道分数。通过 在高校师生中开展“关于在高校大学英语课程考试中采用标 准分来报道分数的可行性”的问卷调查，发现师生对标准分 的总体评价普遍较高，支持利用标准分推断学生原始分数在 团体中所处位置，使用标准分的意愿也较强烈，并且支持对传 统原始分制进行改革。同时发现，师生在实际的教/学的过程 中不知如何根据标准分提供的信息来调整教/学的方法与内 容，师生对原始分与标准分的感知在三个问题上存在显著性 差异。本文通过调查结果分析了标准分难以在高校课程考试 中推广的原因，从而提出可行的解决策略，藉此为进一步改革 原始分制与完善标准分制提供一些参考。<br>Z-score is seldom used to report students’ performance in the college curriculum examination. By conducting among college teachers and students a questionnaire survey on the feasibility of reporting scores of college English course examination using z-score, it is found that generally teachers and students have a higher opinion of z-score, both show more support of using z-score to infer the position of raw score in the group, hold the view that z-score is more reasonable, present stronger willingness to use z-score, show more support for the reform of traditional centesimal system, meanwhile, teachers and students respond that in the actual teaching/learning process they do not know how to adjust their teaching/learning method and content according to the information provided by z-score; there are significant differences between teachers and students’ perception of raw score and z-score in terms of three questions. By analyzing the feedback from the survey, the reasons why z-score is difficult to be popularized in reporting scores of college course examination can be found, then feasible solutions are proposed accordingly, thereby providing some hints for further reforming the raw score system and improving the z-score system.
%K 课程考试
%K 学生评价
%K 原始分
%K 标准分
%K 描述性统计
%K 独立样本t检验&lt
%K br&gt
%K raw score
%K z-score
%K descriptive statistics
%K independent samples t-test
%U http://dxjykx.cnmanu.cn/Web/ViewAbstract.aspx?GaoHao=20170309