%0 Journal Article
%T 审前阶段媒体介入司法程序的效果与规制——欧洲经验及其启示<br>The effect and regulation of media intervention in judicial proceedings in pre-trial stages: The European experience and its inspiration
%A 谢锦添
%J 重庆大学学报社会科学版
%D 2017
%R 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2017.05.013
%X 自大众传媒产生之日起，关于法律案件的新闻报道便受到了种种竞争性法律价值的限制。拥有引导舆论功能的新闻媒体在诉讼程序的审前、庭审以及审后阶段的报道，对司法程序及相关利益产生了不同程度的影响。就某种意义而言，新闻媒体与诉讼程序俨然成为矛盾的对立双方。尽管这一矛盾法避免，但通过界定和判断新闻自由与竞争性利益之间的关系，我们可以进行新的关系调整以减小矛盾影响，欧洲人权法院在削弱两者矛盾方面作出了许多探索和贡献。文章试图借鉴欧洲经验，分析审前阶段媒体介入司法程序的效果与规制，以确立媒体与司法程序之间的合理关系。<br>Media coverage of court proceedings has always been limited by other competitive legal value.In the proceedings of pre-trial, trial and post-trial stages, media coverage has different impact on procedures and related interests, so the relationship between the freedom of speech of the media and the competing interests need to be redefined and judged, thus making new adjustments.The ECHR in terms of resolving the contradiction between the media and the proceedings has great contributions, but that conflict is inevitable and has been steadily developing.This paper attempted to learn from the European experience, and to make an analysis of the effect and regulation of media intervention in judicial proceedings in pre-trial stages in order to establish a reasonable relationship between the media and the judicial procedures.
%K 媒体
%K 司法程序
%K 欧洲人权公约
%K 蔑视法庭罪
%K 规制&lt
%K br&gt
%K media
%K judicial procedures
%K European Convention on Human Rights
%K contempt
%K regulation
%U http://qks.cqu.edu.cn/cqdxskcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20170513&flag=1