%0 Journal Article
%T “欠债偿命”的逻辑悖论与刑法危机<br>On the Logical Paradox of “Debt for Life” and Criminal Law Crisis
%A 姚万勤
%J 重庆大学学报社会科学版
%D 2015
%R 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2015.02.017
%X “杀人偿命、欠债还钱”的古老格言早已划定了中国死刑适用范围,然而刑法“重刑主义”的毒瘤使集资诈骗罪依然保留了死刑规定,如此泛滥的死刑规定导致难以克服的立法与司法的双重逻辑悖论。刑法作为社会自身的一种存在方式,用之不当会造成新的恶害。因此,对集资诈骗罪过多适用死刑判决将不可避免地使刑法产生空前危机,尤其是突破了主客观相统一的量刑规则,荡涤了刑法谦抑性,使刑法沦为国家强制推行其意志的暴力工具。虽然现阶段全面废除死刑的条件尚未成熟,但是通过对行为人剥夺人身自由和既得利益等措施足以有效地遏制非法集资案件的发生,因而并不妨碍废除集资诈骗罪的死刑规定。<br>“Sharenchangming, Qianzhaihuanqian”, the old adage has delineated the scope of China’s death penalty, but the cancer “severe punishment” criminal law of the crime of fraud still retains the death penalty, this flood of the death penalty in legislation and judicature doubles paradox difficult to overcome. The criminal law as a way of existence for the society itself, improper use will cause new evil, so the fraud crime suitable for the death penalty will inevitably make the criminal law has an unprecedented crisis, especially breaking the unity of subjective and objective rules of sentencing, cleaning up the modesty of criminal law, and the criminal law becomes the mandatory tools of violence of country’s will. Although the condition is not yet mature to completely abolish the death penalty at this stage, but the behavior of human deprivation of personal liberty and vested interest and other measures can effectively curb the occurrence of illegal fund-raising case, so it does not prevent the abolition of crime of fraud of the death penalty.
%K 曾成杰案
%K 欠债偿命
%K 集资诈骗
%K 刑法谦抑性
%K 死刑&lt
%K br&gt
%K Zeng Chengjie case
%K debt for life
%K fraud
%K criminal law
%K the death penalty
%U http://qks.cqu.edu.cn/cqdxskcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=201502018&flag=1