%0 Journal Article
%T 农村住宅夜间3种床/炕加热方式对比实验研究<br>Experimental analysis on three kinds of bed/kang heating method in rural houses at night
%A 刘嘉楠
%A 刘艳峰
%A 李涛
%A 王登甲
%A 陈耀文
%J 土木建筑与环境工程
%D 2018
%R 10.11835/j.issn.1674-4764.2018.04.008
%X 提出一种新型热盘管炕作为夜间采暖方式，与村镇普遍使用的火炕、电热毯在被褥热环境和室内环境方面的差异进行对比实验。分析发现，电热毯采暖响应速度快，但被褥热均匀性差，供热能力有限，法保障室内温度；火炕采暖响应速度较快，但被褥温度保障时间短、可调节性差，室内存在烟气，CO2浓度超标；热盘管炕采暖响应速度一般，但被褥温度分布均匀，温度稳定后人体热舒适区占比可达80%以上，且室内环境良好。<br>A new type of night heating method, known as Hot Tube Chinese Kang, is compared with wide-spread conventional heated kang as well as electric blankets in villages and towns, through contrast experiment which provides exactly same control variables in terms of building dimensions. After a comparative analysis regarding bedding temperature, indoor environment, and other aspects, the results illustrate:the electric blanket has a rapid response of heating, however, due to the poor thermal uniformity of bedding and limited heating capacity, the indoor temperature cannot be guaranteed. The response speed of heating of heated kang is faster, but the time for temperature protection of bedding is short, the adjustability is poor and the concentration of carbon dioxide exceed hot tube Chinese kang promise the bedding thermal homogeneity that comfort zone accounted for more than 80%, also generate moderate indoor environment.
%K 农村地区 热盘管炕 被褥温度 室内热环境 热舒适性&lt
%K br&gt
%K rural areas hot tube Chinese kangs bedding temperature indoor thermal environment thermal comfort
%U http://qks.cqu.edu.cn/cqdxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20180408&flag=1