%0 Journal Article
%T 识字能力的单维性检验研究<br> Unidimensional Assessment for Ability of Literacy
%A 温红博
%A 唐文君
%A 刘先伟
%J 心理发展与教育
%D 2016
%R 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.01.10
%X 本研究以义务教育阶段学生识字量测验为工具,综合运用探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)以及非参数项目反应理论中的摩根量表(Mokken量表)和DETECT分析方法,探讨了识字能力的维度。探索性结构方程建模结果显示,识字的单维性模型优于多维模型,多维的结果更多的体现出一个难度维度的特征,即字频的作用。Mokken量表分析结果显示,1~2年级和3~9年级测验更倾向于单维量表的特征。DETECT分析结果显示,两个测验的D值趋近于零,表明识字能力是单维能力。结合三种分析方法,识字能力具有单维性。<br>Comparability of test scores are affected by the test's dimensionality, before estimating student's scores, we need to estimate literacy's dimensionality. The study aims to analyze dimensionality of literacy ability based on dichotomous items scale for compulsory education phase students. We assume that literacy is unidimensional. The tool is Chinese character quantity test for compulsory education stage students, the test is constructed of two editions; the first edition is used for 1 to 2 grade students, and is consisted of 36 Chinese characters. The second edition is used for 3 to 9 grade students, and is consisted of 45 Chinese characters. And the test's reliability and validity are good, can be used to analyze dimensionality of literacy ability. More than 1300 students, from one to eight grades students, are selected randomly. Using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and nonparametric item response theory (NIRT), including the MSP and DETECT, to analyze literacy dimensionality. At first, do exploratory structural equation modeling analysis, using Mplus6.0. The model fit analysis results show, the model fit index for unidimensional model and multidimensional model are all acceptable, and the multidimensional model is better than unidimensional model, but considering of terseness of model, the unidimensional model is more appropriate. The eigenvalue analysis results show, the largest eigenvalue divide the second eigenvalue is 2.62 for 1~2 edition, and 5.35 for 3~9 edition test. According to the criterion, the 3~9 edition test is one-dimensional test, and the 1~2 edition is not. For factor loading analysis, in 1~2 edition test, in single factor model, the factor loading are above than 0.4 for all, except the 8 item. In double factors model, in despite of the 23 item is less than 0.4, the 1 item to 11item and 14 item are all belong to the factor 1, others are belong to the factor 2. Because items are assigned according to the word frequency from high to low, the results indicate, word frequency influenced literacy, but it is just a difficult dimensionality rather than an ability dimensionality. The 3~9 edition test shows similar results. In a word, the unidimensional model is superior to the multidimensional model, and in multidimensional model, didn't find differences between sound and
%K 识字能力
%K 单维性检验
%K 探索性结构方程建模
%K 非参数项目反应理论&lt
%K br&gt
%K literacy ability
%K unidimensional assessment
%K exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM)
%K nonparametric item response theory (NIRT)
%U http://www.devpsy.com.cn/CN/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.01.10