%0 Journal Article
%T 中国运动训练学需面对的三个问题：学科内容、研究范式与知识建构——基于一种双重转型的考虑<br>Discipline Content, Research Paradigm and Knowledge Construction in China Sports Coaching: A Double Transformation Consideration
%A 董德龙
%A 杨斌
%J 北京体育大学学报
%D 2015
%R 10.19582/j.cnki.11-3785/g8.2015.03.022
%X 摘要：为了更好的认识和推动中国运动训练学学科的发展，使其在经历知识引入、学科构建、问题论争为时代特点的发展之后，更快的步入学科“共时态压缩”轨道。通过文献资料、专家访谈及逻辑思辨等方法，对中国运动训练学的学科内容、研究范式及知识建构三个问题进行了讨论，并得出以下结论：1) 在学科内容上，实现从“体系构建”向“问题关注”并由“问题关注”向“问题间关注”的转型；2) 在研究范式上，实现从“描述性研究”向“实验性研究”并由“实验性研究”向“解释性研究”的转型; 3) 在知识建构上，实现从“学科嫁接”向“学科联姻”并由“学科联姻”向“学科内生”化方向的转型;4)中国运动训练学的转型应是双重的，单纯的“历时态”发展轨迹不利用中国运动训练学的“引领化”发展。<br>Abstract: In order to promote the development of sports coaching in china and make it into “synchronic orbit” after knowledge introduction, discipline construction and question debate, this paper discussed its discipline content, research paradigm and knowledge construction by the methods of literature review, expert interview, and logical analysis. Conclusions: 1) In discipline content, it will realize the transform from “system construction” to “issues concern” firstly, and then form “issues concern” to “relationship focus”. 2) In research paradigm, it will realize the transform from “descriptive research” to “experiment research”, and then from “experiment research” to “expositive research”. 3) In knowledge construction, it will realize the transform from “discipline attachment” to “discipline marriage” firstly, and then from “discipline marriage” to “discipline endogenous”. 4) China sports coaching transformation must be double transformation, “diachronic” development path is insufficient for development of sports training in China
%K China sports coaching sports training practice discipline transformation
%U http://xuebao.bsu.edu.cn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20150322&flag=1